Contra Costa County, CA

Welcome to the Contra Costa County Section of the ADC Website.


Residents of Contra Costa County have the right to know what is in the source of their drinking water...and the right to address these issues with the Contra Costa Board of Supervisors who have the final say on what herbicides and other toxic chemicals are introduced into the source of your drinking water.  We have dedicated an entrie section of this website to this subject.  Click on the link below for more information:




SMART METERS are being placed on your homes and businesses without your consent. 


ALERT:  PG&E Customers have only until the end of March to have gas and elected Smart Meters removed from your homes and offices due to the new California Public Utilities Decision on February 1, 2012.  If you don't want a Smart Meter on your gas or electric meter you must notify PG&E in writing.


These Electric and Gas Smart Meters have certain types of drawbacks and possible health impacts to residents living near you and also to those who live in the apartments and homes you own or live in at this time.  We have dedicated a section on this website to the Smart Meter Issue and we encourage everone to research this issue before allowing any utility company, like PG&E, to place one on your home or business:





ALERT!   Social Security Funding is also on the U.S. Congress Chopping Block and a vote is expected before February 29, 2012.  Please Visit the following links for more information on this important issue: 



Another important issues facing all of us is the Public Education System.  This system, where everyone is guaranteed a free education, and where those in charge of the Public School System must be elected, has been the backbone of America for decades.


Now our public education system is under full-scale attack in order to privatize, commercialize, and computerize through questionable online curriculums, designed by corporate and private interests.  Privatization started with the private charter school movement which is no now able to legally steal money from the public education system to fund private, unelected interests, the push for voucher systems, and the belief that having private / public monetary partnerships are better than public funding of schools where education is free for every child. 

Many of these new schools have profits as their goal...and when profits are introduced into the education of your children...they will suffer the consequences. And many more of these private charter schools won't get enough money from the public coffers to operate thus driving these schools to cut costs while allowing corporate interests to fund and decide what should be taught in these private/semi-public schools. 

Do we want private corporations, private individuals, and special interests involved in deciding what our children learn and read about U.S. history which is rewritten not to promote a broad education but the beliefs of private interests without public control? 

Why are we willing to release our public education system over to control by those interested in subverting the educational process with their personal, private or corporate belief systems?  The university systems are taking more and more corporate money and return for what?  Have they become so indebted from corporate that they are will to promote corporate interests even when their own research does not substantiate corporate claims?

U.S. Congressman George Miller and many of your local state, city, and county representatives are promoting the privatization of our schools through promoting Charter Schools. 

Do you want a voice in the education of your children or are you will to lose your voice and privatize your school and let others make the final decision aobut the education of your children?  The Choice is Yours to Make!

For More Information on Education Issues: 


What kind of an education to you want for your children?


California State Budget 2012-2013  (Note Education Section in Link Below) 


August 9, 2011

Mount Diablo Unified School District

Gary Eberhart, President, Sherry Whitmarsh, Vice-President

Members of the Mount Diablo School District Board

1936 Carlotta Drive, Concord, California 94519

(925) 682-8000 Extension: 4000


Dear President Eberhart & Members of the Board:


What are Charter Schools?  Charter schools are publicly financed private schools that operate largely independent of government regulation. They operate almost entirely without public accountability or oversight once established within a public school district. Charter schools produce a system where select groups of parents, administrators or private corporations (their boards are not usually elected by the public-at large), deliver one level of education in their charter school letting the public schools struggle with a lesser level of education due to the reauthorization of public school funds to a charter school.

How do they contribute to a breakdown of public schooling? They create a two-tiered education system that takes money away from the public school system without providing all of the benefits of a full public education to their charter school students.  Many charter schools don’t provide sport programs, extra-curricular activities, good school lunch programs, and may have limited funds for textbooks (most do not use the same ones used in public schools); thus increasing their operating costs.  Charter Schools divert money and attention from improving all public schools to enhancing a few “for profit” schools with no “oversight” of how taxpayer funding is spent.

In a July 30, 2010, article on charter schools by Jill Tucker of the San Francisco Chronicle:  “…Failing charter schools across California could be shut down by the state Board of Education under a major policy shift aimed at ensuring that the alternative public schools fulfill their role as models of academic innovation. Dozens of the state's 850 or so charter schools, which have significant freedom outside the state Education Code, fall among the lowest performing schools on standardized tests. That's unacceptable, California State Board of Education members say. "I don't have a lot of tolerance for these schools," said Board of Education member Ben Austin. "We need to be holding charter schools to at least the same standard as regular schools, if not higher."

School Lunches - The Los Angeles Times reported on January 1, 2011:  “…Mealtime is more complicated at the more than 900 publicly financed charter schools in California. Unlike traditional campuses that must follow state nutrition regulations for schools, charters can make independent decisions about what's for lunch. Some charter school officials decide not to serve it at all, even if that might mean that the nutrition needs of some of the state's children are not being met… Although charters — just like traditional public schools — can get a cash subsidy from the U.S. Department of Agriculture to help provide meals to children, they are exempt from a state requirement to serve at least one nutritionally adequate subsidized meal a day to qualifying children…” 

Charter schools can save money by not providing school lunches and many don’t have the required facilities, school lunch programs, and may not withstand public health inspections of their facilities.  The Los Angeles Times (1/2/2011) stated:  “…A recent (California) state audit was conducted in part to try to answer that question. Auditors were able to determine that more than half of the 815 charters active in April did participate in federal breakfast or lunch programs…However, auditors found that the state education department lacked reliable data on charters' nutrition programs…Attempts to get answers directly from charter schools met with no response in dozens of cases… Even with access to government funding, other charter schools report that they do not have the resources to feed students on campus or to comply with the numerous food safety, nutrition and administrative requirements to participate in federal food programs…There's a huge record-keeping requirement for all of these programs…” which leads to denying children programs that are available at all public schools.

Research indicates that inequalities in schooling and segregation by social class have increased in the United States since charter schools were first introduced. Most of the people who choose the alternatives are from high socio-economic status and want to impose certain types of ideology, religion, or special interest teaching on their students without public oversight.  They also recruit students that are likely to perform to pre-set academic standards to market their schools to compete with the public schools while excluding students with expensive special needs or those students that aren’t achieving to their required academic standards. 

Many of these charter schools are run for private profit by inexperienced parents or by corporations with their own agenda.  Since charter schools need additional money to operate besides public funds they must raise money through fundraisers or private corporations with varied educational agendas.  Increasing numbers of charter schools in California and across the U.S. have been charged with fiscal mismanagement of public funds according to recent newspaper reports and studies.  The Press Democrat (Santa Rosa, California August 12, 2011), reported that nearly $400,000 was embezzled from the Kid Street Learning Center Charter School by their accountant who was hired because she was a supporter of the school and a nice person. 

Public education represents the largest market opportunity that could be taken-over and exploited by “for profit” groups, parents, or corporate entities.  The transfer of public funds for private profit, at the expense of public education for all of our children, should be rejected.  Many new so-called education management organizations or private foundations are working to turn our public education system into a “for-profit model” at taxpayer expense.  The end result will be that the majority of our children will receive substandard or “special interest” driven education with no public oversight or control.

In some cases students and parents find that charter schools make decisions that are not in the best interests of their students.  In the case of the Mount Diablo Unified School District, the Board has to be elected by the public and therefore their decisions must be made in the public interest of all their students rather than an increase in private profits.  Charter schools have no such system in place for the public to address their concerns about charter school operations, how funds are spent or type of curriculum.  Teachers in many of these school may be hired or fired at any time and there are few requirements that they have the same educational standards as do teachers in public schools.

Charter schools don't reduce spending on administration parallel to already established public schools, because they must create a new and expensive administration to run their schools, diverting money away from teacher salaries and textbooks.  This further reduces the money needed for the education of their students and for enriching their programs.  Our public school system in Mount Diablo already has administrators in place to handle finances, day-to-day administration, insurance services, student transportation, benefits, sports programs, repairs, buildings, maintenance services, gyms, and other facilities.  The new charter school will have few of these facilities thus limiting the education of their students even more. 

If, as in the case of the Mount Diablo School District, the entire high school is taken over by a charter school, it severely reduces the benefits that the students receive from belonging to the Mount Diablo Unified School District.  In addition, the burden of raising additional funding, will fall squarely on the shoulders of this new private charter school which has no prior experience operating such a school.  In many charter schools the employees working within this structure find their own circumstances changed as new demands for money and the demands of those in power increase their work hours and lower their income.

The public school advantages of bulk purchasing and efficiencies of scale are lost in the charter schools, making materials and services more expensive. Salaries of principals and administrators in many charter schools have soared and duplicate oversight services already provided within the public school system. There is a booming market for private enterprise inside charter schools; everything from companies that actually run schools for profit to hard-sell business advertising in classrooms.

Parent advisory committees and other groups provide an opportunity for parental input within the public school system.  Many charter schools don’t welcome public interference and there is no mechanism for change, through public elections, other than for parents to remove their students from charters schools if they don’t like their educational program.  Particular languages, areas of focus such as the arts, and special needs are already met by programs within the public school system thus reducing the need for charter schools.  Many charter schools don’t have the funding to either continue or offer these programs to their students due to lack of funding, expertise or interest in working with special needs children.

According to a Stanford, CA Study:  “…A new report issued today by the Center for Research on Education Outcomes (CREDO) at Stanford University found that there is a wide variance in the quality of the nation’s several thousand charter schools with, in the aggregate, students in charter schools not faring as well as students in traditional public schools…”

“…While the report recognized a robust national demand for more charter schools from parents and local communities, it found that 17 percent of charter schools reported academic gains that were significantly better than traditional public schools, while 37 percent of charter schools showed gains that were worse than their traditional public school counterparts, with 46 percent of charter schools demonstrating no significant difference…”

The report is the first detailed national assessment of charter schools. It analyzed 70% of the nation's students attending charter schools and compared the academic progress of those students with that of demographically matched students in nearby public schools.  See:

Increasing budget cuts at all levels of government are reducing the amount of money available to public schools.  Now is not the time to take additional funding away from the public school system for private charter schools.  Approval of this charter school would clearly jeopardize the quality of education of all children in the Mount Diablo School District by reducing the funding for their education.

The Mount Diablo School Board should vote against this charter school proposal in order to maintain the educational standards and financial integrity of the Mount Diablo Public School District. Charter schools should not be allowed to receive taxpayers funding intended for the benefit of all of the children in our public schools. The Board should vote “no” on the new charter school and vote “yes” to protect the public interest of all the children now in public schools. 


Rosalind Peterson

Editorial Note:  The Mount Diablo School Board voted to approve turning a public high school into a private charter school knowing that there was insufficient funds to run this school and all of its current programs.  What type of education will your children receive in this private school?  And if you don't like the results what recourse do you have since the people now running this private Charter High School are no longer elected by the public?

For More Information on Education Issues: 

72E 1995 Contra Costa County, CA CBEDS Report 1995 Note School Dropout Statistics 1994-1995.pdf

72E 1996 Contra Costa County, CA CBEDS Report 1996 School Dropout Rates.pdf

72E 2011 Contra Costa County CA Listing of Charter Schools California Department of Education Website October 6, 2011.pdf

72E 2011 Contra Costa County CA Pittsburg School Post County's Highest Dropout Rate September 7, 2011 Contra Costa Times.pdf

72E 2011 Contra Costa County CA School Dropout Rate Listed by School California Department of Education.pdf

72E 2011 Contra Costa County School Dropout Rate by School California Department of Education Page 2.pdf

72E 2011 Contra Costa County School Dropout Rate by School California Department of Education Page 3.pdf

72E 2011 Contra Costa County School Dropout Rate by School California Department of Education Page 4.pdf

72E 2011 Contra Costa County School Dropouts by Grade 2009-2010 CA Dept. of Education.pdf

72E 2011 Letter to the Mount Diablo School Board Regarding Charter Schools August 9, 2011 by Rosalind Peterson.pdf

72E 2011 U.S. Congressman Miller Charter Schools ESEA Reauthorization Clears House Education Panel June 22, 2011-Note Charter Schools.pdf

72E 2011 West Contra Costa School Dropout Rates Worse Than State Average August 14, 2011 Contra Costa Times.pdf

109 1 2012 Video Game Change in Washington, D.C. by Obama Administration FEB 1, 2012 USA Today New Game Change CZAR.pdf

109A 2012 Why is the U.S. Congress Redlining Our Schools January 10, 2012 The Nation Article.pdf

Health Issues


72H 2011 Contra Costa Health Department Warning November 8, 2011 News Oil Spill Problems.pdf

U.S. Naval Weapons Station - Concord, California


72N 2011 Contra Costa County Health Services at Concord Naval Weapons Station November 8, 2011 http___cchealth.pdf

Weather Modification Programs


Your weather is being modified in California PG&E and Many other entities.  Many states are also engaged in Weather Modification.  Foreign Countries are also modifiying the weather.  These experiments have the potential to change the weather in your area and also to have negative impacts on the amount of water available for agriculture and drinking.  The link below shows a map of U.S. and Worldwide Weather Modification Programs & Experiments: 

450WV 2008 NOAA Final Listing of Weather Modification Programs Spreadsheet 08WXMOD5.pdf

450WV 2009 NOAA Final Listing of Weather Modification Programs Spreadsheet 09WXMOD5.pdf

450WV 2010 NOAA Final Listing of Weather Modification Programs Spreadsheet 10WXMOD5.pdf

450WV 2011 NOAA Interim Listing of Weather Modification Programs Spreadsheet 11WXMOD5 as of July 7, 2011.pdf


24 1 2011 Spare the Air-Air Quality in the Bay Area December 5-12, 2011 Graphic-Note Decreases in Air Quality.pdf

24 1 2012 Spare the Air-Air Quality in the Bay Area January 16-22, 2012 Graphic-Note North Bay Moderate Air Quality.pdf

24 1 2012 Spare the Air-Air Quality in the Bay Area January 2-8, 2012 Graphic-Note Decreases in Air Quality.pdf

24 1 2012 Spare the Air-Air Quality in the Bay Area January 9-15, 2012 Graphic-Note Decreases in Air Quality.pdf


No Comment


72PZ 2011 Contra Costa Times Delaying Bay Area Air Quality Management not Enough-Unethical Plans-Use Public Funds SEPT 21, 2011.pdf

72Z 2011 SunPower-Congressman Miller's Son Conflict of Interest-$Millions for Corporation Moving to Mexico OCT 11, 2011 Many Questions.pdf

Is new form of pesticide to blame for catastrophic decline in honey bees?

US study shows latest nicotine-based sprays attack insects' immune systems:

By Tamara Cohen

Last updated at 8:07 PM on 29th January 2012

"...A new generation of pesticides may be to blame for the catastrophic decline in Britain’s honey bees. The contain chemicals, routinely used on farms and in garden centres make bees more vulnerable to disease, a study has shown. There have been concerns for some years about neonicotinoids, a family of chemicals based on nicotine, but a study by an expert based in the US finally confirms a link..." Other information about honey bees: