GeoEngineering Schemes
Welcome to the Geoengineering Schemes Section of the ADC Website
Geoengineering is defined as "planetary-scale enviromental engineering of our atmosphere, our weather, the oceans, and the Earth itself". The methods, schemes, that may now be used without public oversight, debate, prior public notification, U.S. Congress or any oversight are staggering in number and scope.
GEOENGINEERING ALERT 2012 - FOR INFORMATION VISIT:
http://www.agriculturedefensecoalition.org/content/geoengineering-new-mexico
The Congressional Research Service released it new report on Geoengineering for members of the U.S. Congress on August 16, 2010. The U.S. House Science & Technology Committee released their Final Geoengineering Report on October 27, 2010. The U.S. House Science and Technology Committee on Geoengineering is working with the UK Parliament on Global Geoengineering Governance which has released its 5th Report (printed by the House of Commons), on March 10, 2010.
Click on the link below to read these reports:
http://www.agriculturedefensecoalition.org/content/geoengineering-current-actions
(Update: We should all remember that volcanoes erupt each year negating the need for any geoengineering schemes to be deployed. In March 2010, a volcano in Iceland erupted and sent an ash cloud spreading over Europe which lasted for months and may have created global cooling along with acid rains which will have negative impacts on trees, water supplies, oceans, and soils. Earth's natural systems are still working...and we can't afford for man to add to these problems or exacerbate them by deploying more toxic chemicals, gases, and particles into the atmosphere to reduce the amount of direct sunlight reaching the Earth. Each unpredictable volcanic eruption on Earth adds pollution and changes our global atmosphere.
A few geoengineers have been on the news in recent days stating that the Iceland volcano will not cause any cooling...in order to keep promoting geoengineering as an option. It should be noted that other scientists have been stating for the news media that these volcanic plumes will change the weather and also that there are acid rains and human health problems which could be associated with this and other periodic eruptions.
Geoengineers have no advance notice of volcanic eruptions nor will they know when future eruptions will take place. Thus, we have to consider these natural events and measure them their synergistic and cumulative effects before considering artificial geoengineering schemes. In addition, the synergistic and cumulative effects of their proposed geoengineering schemes, and what influence natural future volcanic eruptions will have, is unknown. It is now time to permanently stop man-made geoengineering schemes.
Many private corporations, universities, government agencies, private individuals, states, counties, and cities, have deployed, or will will deploy, a vast array of geoengineering experiments in the near future without public oversight or consent. Currently no government agency, or the U.S. Congress at this time, will have any idea what the cumulative or synergistic effects may be when these experiments are deployed. In addition, no one, not even the U.S. Congress or the public, will have any oversight of these programs, the chemicals or particles that will be used or how these schemes will be implemented. Thus, action is needed today to prevent these questionable experiments.
The U.S. House Science & Technology Committee and the UK Parliament have engaged in an agreement to participate in geoengineering discussions and the possible implementation of global geoengineering governance proposed by the Royal Society and several climate scientists. Meetings continue to be held around the world to promote the implementation of more programs.
The purpose of one set of schemes is to initiate “Solar Radiation Management (SRM)” experiments. SRM is designed to reduce the amount of direct sunlight reaching the Earth. The consequences of these SRM schemes are unknown since planetary-scale engineering involves so many different geoengineering schemes with unknown cumulative and synergistic effects.
A key AAAS February 2010, geoengineering write-up states: “…Studies show, however, that people make judgments based primarily on their values, belief systems, world views, and emotions. Facts play a much more minor role. This gap cannot be bridged by loading the public with facts, or trying to make the public more science literate…” Thus, a whole series of presentations were made to advise geoengineers and others on how to manipulate the public so that they would support these schemes.
In a Press Release Dated December of 2002 titled: “GEOENGINEERING TOO RISKY” A Lawrence Livermore Laboratory Press release warns, “…There are many reasons why geoengineering is not a preferred option for climate stabilization...” These prescriptions include risks of global “system failure” and the “unpredictable responses” of Earth's climate system to large-scale human intervention…”
On March 22-26, 2010, the Climate Respond Fund (note the partners listing in the document section below), sponsored the Asilomar International Conference on Climate Intervention Technologies in Monterey, California. The conference was designed to develop (global geoengineering governance) guidelines for “…research and testing of proposed climate intervention and geoengineering technologies…”
What are the consequences of deploying Solar Radiation Management geoengineering experiments?
1) Some of these experiments are designed to reduce the amount of direct sunlight reaching the Earth thus reducing the power output and the effectiveness of solar panels and solar cars.
2) Many proposed chemicals or particles used in these geoengineering schemes (i.e., U.S. Navy/NASA C.A.R.E. experiment used a rocket to create an aluminum oxide dust cloud over the Eastern portion of the U.S. on September 19, 2009), are likely to be toxic to humans, marine mammals, oceans, fish, wildlife, food pollinators, and birds. Many of these toxic chemicals, like sulfur, have the potential to contaminate drinking water, soil, cause acid rain or air pollution, and may impair human health, from lack of Vitamin D, by reducing the amount of sunlight reaching the Earth.
3) NASA research studies show that increasingly persistent jet contrails may turn into “man-made clouds” (or white haze), and are “…trapping warmth in the atmosphere and exacerbating global warming…Any change in global cloud cover may contribute to long-term changes in the Earth’s climate…” No current U.S. legislation addresses water vapor and aviation impacts on the global atmosphere. In addition, our scientists do not appear to be funding or working toward reducing or eliminating this problem. What happens when additional programs are put in place to reduce the amount of sunlight reaching the Earth when we already have man-made clouds dimming the sun and exacerbating global warming?
4) SRM may limit Honey Bee food pollination because the bee navigates and communicates though the use of ultraviolet light. And we have no idea what the cumulative impacts of toxic chemicals, particles, and reduced sunlight will have on all of our pollinators endangering food production.
5) Photosynthesis is required for the majority of life on Earth to exist, along with healthy trees, and food crop production. When cloud cover and reduced sunlight is present crop production drops. When direct sunlight and normal rainfall is present crop production increases. What happens when geoengineers deliberate reduce the amount of direct sunlight reaching the Earth? What are the consequences of multiple uncontrolled experiments?
The climate scientists and geoengineers all have one repeated mantra: “…Geoengineering is not a solution to climate change and global warming…” They are instead enlisting support to spend enormous sums to buy time to do something later. Just what research, project funding, and development are they now engaging in to fix our current pollution problems now? Nothing! They are not promoting research into benefits that will be long-lasting or make a difference now.
The “temporary fix” theory with “unknown consequences” seems to be their only contribution to the disaster they predict. Should the public be willing to accept this temporary fix with unknown consequences? This attitude is unacceptable because those conducting the geoengineering experiments will be unaccountable if their experiments go awry or create profound negative consequences.
Professor Benford (U.C. Irvine, CA), wrote the following regarding the public in a Reason.com article in 1997: “…But perhaps the greatest unknown is social: How will the politically aware public react--those who vote, anyway? If geoengineers are painted early and often as Dr. Strangeloves of the air, they will fail. Properly portrayed as allies of science--and true environmentalism--they could become heroes… A major factor here will be whether mitigation looks like yet another top-down contrivance, another set of orders from the elite. Draconian policing of fuel burning will certainly look that way, a frowning Aunt Bessie elbowing into daily details...In contrast, mitigation does not have to push a new camel's nose into our tents... Technical solutions can play out far from people's lives, on the sea or high in the air…Once we become caretakers, we cannot stop...(they) must be carried forward in the shadow of our stewardship…"
Instead of questionable geoengineering experiments all reductions of greenhouse gas emissions and other pollutants, at their source, should be regulated by the Environmental Protection Agency and all funding should go to the EPA for developing alternative energy and transportation. Scientists and researchers should be funded to invent ways to use waste energy from currently operating energy plants to produce clean, green power, and reduce greenhouse gas emissions is where funding should be directed…not to those programs and experiments that will not reduce our impact on Earth from various types of pollution sources. The energy of the geoengineers should be redirected to solve pollution problems not add to them.
On June 10, 2010, the U.S. Senate voted to uphold a 2007, U.S. Supreme Court Decision, that allows the EPA to regulated and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. There is no reason to initiate global geoengineering programs when we have the ability to reduce pollution under our laws. Reduction is the preferred alternative to pollution...not adding more toxic contaminates to our atmosphere that will impact life on Earth as we know it.
Our local, county, state and federal representatives should take immediate action to stop these geoengineering scheme deployments until scientists from every field, agriculture interests, ocean scientists, marine biologists, and the public have had time to thoroughly investigate these schemes and their effects on the Earth’s environment.
No one has the right to use the Earth, or Earth’s atmosphere, as a giant experimental physics laboratory due to the unknown consequences of such actions.
State and U.S. Congressional Hearings should be immediately held in order to completely investigate the consequences of proposed and ongoing geoengineering experiments by any individual, state, county, private corporation, the U.S. military, university or U.S. government agencies on agriculture, crop production, human health, and our oceans. There is a lot at stake and all of us should make our voices heard in this debate.
Radio Liberty 2011 Seminar
"Geoengineering the Atmosphere" by Rosalind Peterson
Special Presentation by Allan Buckmann
Aptos, CA - October 23, 2011
Rosalind Peterson, October 23rd, 2011, Aptos, CA. Click on photo to start video.
116 1 2011 Geoengineering-Climate Remediation-SRM Handout Page 1.pdf
116 1 2011 Geoengineering-Climate Remediation-SRM Handout Page 2.pdf
16 1 2011 Geoengineering=Climate Remediation Handout Page 2.pdf
Allan Buchmann's Power Point Presentation
MAN-MADE CLIMATE CHANGE IN THE SKIES - 2011-1.pdf
Articles on Geoengineering
16 1 2011 NASA Data Blows Gaping Hole in Global Warming Alarms July 27, 2011 Forbes+Yahoo News.pdf
16 1 2010 NWV Solar Radiation Management - Geoengineering February 18, 2010 by R. Peterson.pdf
16 2007 NWV Geoengineering Alert An Uncomfortable Truth by Rosalind July 1, 2007 Part II.pdf
16 2009 NWV U.S. Navy Geoengineering Space Project Begins September 15, 2009 by Rosalind.pdf
The United States has been releasing Aluminum and other toxic chemicals (along with rocket fuel emissions), into the atmosphere in order to conduct various atmospheric experiments. It is no suprise tha the whales in all ocean areas were found to have high levels of aluminum.
Global Geoengineering Governance
16A Poster+Banner Geoengineering CRRES + HAARP High Altitude Auroral Research Program 2006 RP.jpg
16AZ 2011 A Few Geoengineering Images Internet July 20, 2011.pdf
This section contains descriptions of all geoengineering schemes that have been discussed in the past ten years. This includes graphics and other information on these schemes.
16B 2007 NASA Summaries of Workshop On Managing Solar Radiation NASA AMES April 2007.pdf
16B 2009 Geoengineering Crazy Ideas+Experiments February 13, 2009 Telegraph.co.uk.pdf
16B 2009 Geoengineering Projects January 28, 2009 Climate Change.pdf
16B 2010 The Return of Dr. Strangelove June 2010 by Clive Hamilton on Climate Geoengineering.pdf
16B 2011 Arctic Geoengineering A Climate Cures Dark Side January 30, 2011 Newsweek Magazine.pdf
Carbon Capture & Sequestration
16BC 2004 Carbon Sequestion Oceans March 13, 2004 Abstract Pacific Ocean Tests.pdf
16BC 2008 Carbon Capture Graphic-Build CO2 Supertrees February 25, 2008 Discover Magazine.pdf
16BC 2008 Carbon Sequestration Geoengineering Project Photograph February 25, 2008 Discover.pdf
Nitrogen Removal
16BC 2010 Carbon Dioxide Sequestration How it Works Spiegel Online News August 22, 2010 Graphic.pdf
16BC 2011 DAC Direct Air Capture of CO2 with Chemicals APS June 1, 2011.pdf
Ocean Iron & Lime Fertilization Schemes (Note Evidence of Problems)
16BI 2000 Ocean Iron Fertilization-Dumping Iron Early History Wired Science November 2000.pdf
16BI 2007 Ocean Iron Fertilization Problems Geoengineering MSNBC March 16, 2007 News.pdf
16BI 2008 Ocean Iron Fertilization 2008 National Institute of Oceanography Project LOHAFEX.pdf
16BI 2009 Ocean Iron Fertilizaton by Trick 2009 Study Shows Marine Ecoystem Impacts.pdf
Solar Mirrors, Sunshades, Sunscreens, Umbrellas, Artificial Ionosphere, Solar Sails
16BM 2007 Geoengineering Space Mirror Over Greenland November 19, 2007 GreenTechNews.pdf
16BM 2007 NASA NIAC Solar Shields March 7, 2007 Fellows Meeting on Solar Shields.pdf
16BM 2007 NASA Study Global Sunscreen Has Likely Thinned-Aerosols Study March 16, 2007 SDNews.pdf
16BM 2007 Solar Umbrella Geoengineering March 16, 2007 Solar Umbrella MSNBC News.pdf
16BM 2007 Space Mirrors Geoengineering Article June 22, 2007 The Wall Street Journal News.pdf
16BM 2007 Sunshade Geoengineering Caldiera Sunshade Could Case Drought August 2, 2007 Brahic.pdf
16BM 2008 Deploy a Planetary Parasol February 25, 2008 Discover Magazine.pdf
16BM 2008 NASA Solar Sail Deployment in Space June 26, 2008 Proposals for Future.pdf
16BM 2008 NASA Solar Sails July 31, 2008 Deployment Planned+History of Solar Sails.pdf
Particles, gases, and other materials injected into the atmosphere to reduce the amount of direct sunlight reaching the Earth.
This can include, but is not limited to, sulfur and aluminum oxide.
16BS 2006 Crutzen Geoengineering C&EN August 1, 2006 Artificial Sulfur Injections Crutzen.pdf
16BS 2006 Sulfur Geoengineering C&ENews Desperate Cooling Measure August 1, 2006.pdf
16BS 2006 Sulfur Upper Atmospheric Releases Geoengineering National Geographic 2006 Sulfur.pdf
16BS 2007 Geoengineering MSNBC 2007 Volcanic Dust - Jet Engines.pdf
16BS 2008 Geoengineering No Comment ScienceDaily News February 22, 2008.pdf
16BS 2008 Sulfate Particle Atmospheric Geoengineering Would Imperil Ozone Layer April 2008.pdf
16BS 2008 Sulfur Geoengineering Sky May 19, 2008 Harold Sun Climate Plan Could Change Sky Color.pdf
16BS 2009 Geoengineering Toxic Chemicals Into Atmosphere - Problems Times Online August 30, 2009.pdf
16BS 2009 Nature Reports October 15, 2009 Geoengineering Risky Business.pdf
16BS 2009 Sulfur Intellectual Ventures Stratoshield White Paper 2009.pdf
Artificial Clouds - Cloud Whitening Experiments - Use of Salts (Potential to contaminate soil and water when the salts rain out over land areas.)
Silicon Valley Scientists 'Brightening' Clouds To Combat Climate Change
Some scientists in Silicon Valley may have to come up with a way to combat climate change.
Only on 5, Kiet Do shows us how cloud brightening would work, if tests are successful. (8/5/15)
Experiments might be coming your neighborhood very soon.
What particles (sea salt), will these scientists be using to brighten clouds?
What happens to the rain in clouds when they are whitened?
What happens when salt or other particulates rain out over land areas polluting air, fresh water, soils, etc?
What happens if this experiment produces negative consequences?
And why the secrecy regarding the dates of these experiments?
16BW 2007 ENN News December 10, 2007 High Cloud Changes Man-Made.pdf
16BW 2008 Artificial Clouds+Other Radical Geoengineer Schemes September 1, 2008 Guardian.co.uk.pdf
16BW 2008 Cloud-Seeding Ships Could Combat Climate Changes September 4, 2008 Physics World News.pdf
16BW 2008 Saltwater Spraying into Atmosphere Image February 25, 2008 Discover Magazine.pdf
16BW 2009 Geoengineering Scheme Oceans 2009 1217-cloud-ships - Salt Pollutes Soil+Water Supplies.pdf
16BW 2009 Modification of Cirrus Clouds to Reduce Global Warming Published OCT 30, 2009 Report.pdf
16BW 2010 Salt Detected in Boulder Colorado Haze March 11, 2010 Science Daily News.pdf
Miscellaneous Methods
16BX 2007 Geoengineering Build Artifical Wetlands from Scratch June 29, 2007 Popular Science.pdf
16BX 2007 Geoengineering Greenland 2008 Discovery Project Earth October 30, 2007.pdf
16BX 2007 Geoengineering Method-Insulate the Glaciers June 29, 2007 Popular Science.pdf
16BX 2007 Geoengineering Method-Tame Storms With Cold Water June 29, 2007 Popular Science.pdf
16BX 2007 Geoengineering Methods to Re-Ice the Arctic June 29, 2007 Popular Science.pdf
16BX 2007 Geoengineering MSNBC News 2007 Artificial Trees.pdf
16BX 2008 Geoengineering Mitigating Global Warming White Papers ENN September 2008.pdf
16BX 2008 Geoengineering Nuts to Radical Ideas Combat Global Warming 2008.pdf
16BX 2009 Wrapping Greenland in a Blanket Geoengineering Feburary 13, 2009.pdf
16BZ 2009 Geoengineering Environmental Modification Techniques S.F. Examiner December 6, 2009.pdf
News Articles - Study References - Other information from 2011
16CZ 2011 No Comment Geoengineering Can Help Save the Planet NYTimes Opinion June 10, 2011.pdf
16CZ 2011 No Comment IRGC Missison+Purpose Website July 22, 2011.pdf
Agriculture Issues - Photosynthesis - Ozone Depletion
Articles & Studies on Geoeingeering between 2009-2010
16E 2009 ERL Research Highlights December 15, 2009 - Geoengineering Solar Radiation Management.pdf
16E 2009 Geoengineering Climate Progress August 12, 2009 Schemes a Monetary Ploy-Questions.pdf
16E 2009 Geoengineering Climate Under Spotlight BBC New October 30, 2009 Questions.pdf
16E 2009 Nature Reports Climate Science in 2009 December 17, 2009 Canada.pdf
16E 2009 Nature Reports Shutting Out the Sun June 11, 2009 Geoengineering Schemes May not Work.pdf
16E 2009 Science Magazine March 11, 2009 Geoengineering Conference Draws Praise-Criticism.pdf
16E 2010 An Evil Atmosphere is Forming Around Geoengineering New Scientist July 21, 2010.pdf
16E 2010 Nature Reports Climate Change-Models May Not Be Accurate January 28, 2010.pdf
16EZ 2009 Geoengineering April 15, 2009 Revkin Dot Earth Climate.pdf
16EZ 2009 Geoengineering Fantasies February 16, 2009 Telegraph.co.uk.pdf
16EZ 2009 Geoengineering Plans February 16, 2009 Telegraph.co.uk. Lovelock.pdf
16EZ 2010 Headline News Solar Radiation Management or Manhattan Project 2.0 by Jutta Schmitt.pdf
16EZ 2010 Climate Scientist Convene Global Geoengineering Summit January 12, 2010 Guardian.co.uk.pdf
16EZ 2010 KQED Climate Watch Concerns Abound as Geoengineering Conference Opens March 21, 2010.pdf
16EZ 2010 NERC Introduction+Funding Website September 6, 2010 UK.pdf
16EZ 2010 NERC Policies Website September 6, 2010 UK Risk Management Notes http___www.nerc.ac.pdf
16EZ 2010 NERC Press Office Website September 6, 2010 Introduction.pdf
16EZ 2010 NERC Press Office Website September 6, 2010.pdf
16EZ 2010 NERC Website September 6, 2010 Completed Research Programmes.pdf
16EZ 2010 Richard S. Courtney March 24, 2010 Background Information-Geoengineering.pdf
16EZ 2010 Spreading Emancipatory Consciousness April 10, 2010 Solar Radiation Management.pdf
16EZ 2010 The California Report Developing a Plan B for Climate Change-Audio March 22, 2010.pdf
16EZ 2011 Geoengineering IRGC Website July 22, 2011.pdf
16EZ 2011 IETA Hunter Discusses Rebuilding Dialogue on Climate March 8, 2011 EETV News.pdf
Global Dimming
16F 2003 Dimming Earth December 18, 2003 Guardian Unlimited - Earth is Darker.pdf
16F 2003 Sunlight Dimming Goodbye Sunshine December 18, 2003 Guardian Unlimited Article.pdf
16F 2005 Global Dimming Science+Nature BBC News December 8, 2005.pdf
16F 2005 Global Dimming=Climate Change January 15, 2005 BBC News.pdf
16F 2006 Dimming the Sun NOBA PBS April 18, 2006 David Sington.pdf
16F 2006 Dimming the Sun NOVA PBS April 18, 2006 Discoveries in Global Dimming.pdf
16F 2006 Dimming the Sun NOVA PBS April 18, 2006 The Contrail Effect.pdf
16F 2006 Dimming the Sun NOVA PBS April 18, 2006 Transcript.pdf
16F 2006 Dimming the Sun NOVA PBS April 18, 2006 Website.pdf
16F 2008 ENN News November 25, 2008 Clouds of Pollution Block Sunlight.pdf
16F 2009 NASA Photosynthesis-Oceans May 28, 2009.pdf
16F 2010 How Does the Sun Effect our Climate-Graphs Union of Concerned Scientists March 10, 2010.pdf
16FW 2008 NOAA Final Listing of Weather Modification Programs Spreadsheet 08WXMOD5.pdf
16FW 2009 NOAA Final Listing of Weather Modification Programs Spreadsheet 09WXMOD5.pdf
16FW 2010 NOAA Final Listing of Weather Modification Programs Spreadsheet 10WXMOD5.pdf
Bill Gates (Microsoft) has decided to become involved in Geoengineering Schemes. He is funding a few scientists who wish to engage in implementing these schemes. In addition, he has given money to various private corporations to conduct experiments.
Any individual with money and other resources, private corporations, governments, and others can use our atmoshere or oceans as an experimental physics laboratory. Universities and NASA have conducted such experiments, along with our military, for years.
It is outrageous that anyone can subject us to these experiments without our consent. And what right does Bill Gates or anyone else have to "play God" with the Earth and the Earth's atmosphere? It is these questions which must be answered before more of these experiments and schemes are conducted.
16G 2009 Bill Gates Patents A Device Aimed at Halting Hurricanes Discover Magazine July 16, 2009.pdf
16G 2010 Bill Gates Funds Seawater Cloud Seeding May 10, 2010 Discover Magazine.pdf
16GC 2010 Bill Gates Cloud Whitening Experiments Using Salt Particles is Dangerous May 11, 2010.pdf
16GW 2009 Bill Gates Hurricane Calming Technology Plan USA Today July 16, 2009 Questions.pdf
16GW 2009 Bill Gates Hurricanes-Bid to Tame Hurricanes Times Online July 19, 2009 New Patents.pdf
16GW 2009 Geoengineering Bill Gates Plan to Stop Hurricanes July 9, 2009 No Public Oversight.pdf
16GW 2010 Bill Gates Hurricane-Fighting Invention August 16, 2009 Huffington Post+Video.pdf
16GZ 2009 Geoengineering + Patents Gates + Myhrvold Connection Google Search December 22, 2009.pdf
16GZ 2009 Intellectual Ventures March 23, 2010 Website About Them-Gates Connection.pdf
16GZ 2010 Just an FYI for Research Gates Salt Particles Armand Neukermans May 13, 2010.pdf
Note: Professor Gregory Benford of U.C. Irving stated in his article on Arctic Geoengineering on November 20, 2006: “…This idea is only the first step in making climate science…into an active science… This is not a new transition in scientific style…We will live inside the experiment …The main thrust of all this is to carefully use our ability to attack warming at its roots – incoming sunlight now, carbon dioxide later… Costs seem readily attainable – perhaps a few hundred of millions of dollars for an Arctic experiment. High altitude trials over the open ocean are little constrained by law or treaty, so show-stopper politics may be avoided…”
Funding: January 28, 2010 Wired Science: Bill Gates has sunk at least $4.5 million of his personal wealth into geoengineering research.
http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2010/01/bill-gates-paying-for-climate-hacking-resear
“…While it’s a small chunk of Gates’ vast personal fortune, it’s a sign that the founder of Microsoft thinks we should at least be looking into the controversial practice of intentionally altering the Earth’s climate on a global scale. “[Gates] views geoengineering as a way to buy time, but it’s not a solution to the problem” of climate change, Gates’ spokesperson John Pinette told Science Insider. “Bill views this as an important avenue for research — among many others, including new forms of clean energy.”
The money will be directed by two high-level scientists at the forefront of geoengineering research: climate scientist Ken Caldeira, of Stanford’s Carnegie Department of Global Ecology, and physicist David Keith of the University of Calgary. They will decide which technologies should receive the cash in order to alter the stratosphere to reflect solar energy, filter carbon dioxide directly from the atmosphere and brighten ocean clouds...”
“…In a related development Keith, one of the scientists directing Gates’ money, co-authored a Nature editorial this week calling for an international fund for “solar-radiation management” in addition to traditional carbon emissions cuts. “Solar-radiation management may be the only human response that can fend off rapid and high-consequence climate change impacts,” Keith said in a press release Wednesday… He and his co-authors, Edward Parson at the University of Michigan and Granger Morgan at Carnegie Mellon University, propose a budget for solar-radiation management (aka geoengineering), beginning with $10 million a year now and growing to $1 billion annually by the end of 2020. The organization that manages the funds would also develop the governance structures to provide transparent risk analysis and manage feedback from the world’s countries…” Thus, there would be no Congressional or public oversight...complete freedom to use the oceans and the atmosphere as a private physics laboratory.
Click on the poster above to see it in full size.
The information below in the form of pdf files are all of the information on geoengineering that is in my database at this time. More geoengineering information will be made available whenever new information becomes available. We do know that the implementation of ocean and atmospheric geoengineering has already started without public consent or oversight. What we need to do now is to put a stop to these programs.
Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy
News Articles & Studies 2007-2008
16I 2007 Geoengineering A Quick Fix With Huge Risks Science Daily News June 6, 2007.pdf
16I 2007 Geoengineering March 17, 2007 Associated Press.pdf
16I 2007 Giving Climate Change a Kick Science Now NOV 9, 2007 Geoengineering Meeting.pdf
16I 2007 World Wildlife Fund Condemns Ocean Iron Fertilization June 28, 2007.pdf
16I 2008 Atmospheric Science-Whither Geoengineering Harm Assessment Needed May 30, 2008 Abstract.pdf
16I 2008 Can We Geoengineer a Cooler Earth Christian Science Monitor July 16, 2008 Page 1.pdf
16I 2008 Can We Geoengineer a Cooler Earth Christian Science Monitor July 16, 2008 Page 2.pdf
16I 2008 Engineering Responses to Climate Change July 2008.pdf
16I 2008 Geoengineering Could Slow Down Global Water Cycle SDNews May 28, 2008.pdf
16I 2008 Geoengineering Dangers NYTimes 2008 Many Questions-Asilomar Not Objective Enough.pdf
16I 2008 Geoengineering Dangers Scientific American October 20, 2008.pdf
16I 2008 Geoengineering For A Feverish Planet Kill or Cure Questions 2008 Guardian.pdf
16I 2008 Geoengineering March 12, 2008 Time Magazine CNN.pdf
16I 2008 Geoengineering March 7, 2008 Dot Earth Revkin NYTimes Climate Fixes.pdf
16I 2008 Geoengineering Schemes September 2, 2008 The Guardian.co.uk Buying Time-A False Premise.pdf
16I 2008 Geoengineering Scientific American October 20, 2008 Hidden Dangers.pdf
16I 2008 Geoengineerng Costs Nature Newsblog AGU December 19, 2008.pdf
16IZ 2008 Geoengineering 2008 Nature Newsblog Costs.pdf
16IZ 2008 Geoengineering A Revolutionary Approch to Climate Change AEI June 3, 2008 A Disaster.pdf
Water Vapor is a Greenhouse Gas. Aviation has Tremendous Impacts on the Earth and our Atmosphere.
Our Elected Officials, Bill Gates, NOAA, NASA, and other other government agencies should be working to solve the pollution, ozone, and water vapor aviation issues. We know from NASA and other studies that Aviation has negative impacts on our atmosphere. Why isn't this issue being addressed? Why are the climate scientists that are promoting geoengineering schemes not working to resolve these aviation issues? We could reduce pollution if investments were made in this area of research. Instead wild geoengineering schemes which will make things worse are being funded. Why?
16J 1987 Clouds Jet Releases Vapor Clouds Abstract December 21,1987 United States Air Force.pdf
16J 1987 Clouds, Vapor Two Phase Jet Releases Abstract December 21, 1987 Health Effects Study.pdf
16J 2000 Alaska 2000 Jet Contrail Cloudiness Report.pdf
16J 2000 Jet Fuel Emissions Abstract 2000 Aviation Efects-Global Atmosphere Significant.pdf
16J 2005 Report Indicates Water Vapor is Rapidly Warming Europe NOV 5, 2005 Science Daily News.pdf
16J 2007 ENN News Spetmeber 29, 2007 Increasing Atmospheric Moisture-Human Activities.pdf
16J 2009 Geoengineering Gets Closer Look MSNBC News October 30, 2009 Climate Fix Many Questions.pdf
16J 2009 NISSE Ionospheric Experiment H2O Released Nordic Rocket Seeding-March 10, 2009.pdf
16J 2009 NISSE Ionospheric Water Experiment March 12, 2009 NISSE 2009.pdf
16J 2009 NISSE March 12, 2009 Ionoshperic Water Experiment via Rocket Seeding.pdf
16J 2010 NOAA Stratospheric Water Vapor is Warming Wild Card-Greenhouse Gas SDNews FEB 1, 2010.pdf
16J 2010 NOAA Study Water Vapor+Clouds=Warming SDNews October 15, 2010 See Graph.pdf
16J 2010 Water Vapor is a Greenhouse Gas DOE ARM Climate Research Study 2010.pdf
16J 2010 Water Vapor Research-A Greenhouse Gas - Cooling+Heating of the Atmosphere 2010.pdf
Partial Geoeningineering History
16K 1998 Geoengineering A Climate Change Mahnattan Project 1998.pdf
16K 1998 Geoengineering A Climate Manhattan Project Stanford 1998.pdf
16K 2002 NAE Technical Symposium on Earth Systems Engineering 2002 Greenhouse Gases.pdf
16K 2006 How to Cool the Planet-Maybe NYTimes June 27, 2006 Page 1.pdf
16K 2006 How to Cool the Planet-Maybe NYTimes June 27, 2006 Page 2.pdf
16KZ 2000 Workshop on Multiscale Atmospheric Dispersions-Federal Community Agenda June 6, 2000.pdf
Legal Issues - Global Geoengineering Governance - Lack of Regulations & Oversight
16L 2010 CSPO Website ASU Geoengineering Clark Miller March 11, 2010 Human Subjects.pdf
Pollution Issues - Carbon Black - Soot - Other Issues
16P 1975 Weather Modification December 22, 1975 Carbon Black-Solar Absorbtion AMS Abstract.pdf
16P 1979 Jet Fuel JP-10 Carbon Black Dispersion Abstract 1979.pdf
16P 2000 NASA Carbon Black - Soot Eats Clouds Turns up Global Thermostat 2000 CNN May 12, 2000.pdf
16P 2002 Carbon Black Isotopc Carbon Black March 5, 2002 Chemical Science+Technology Laboratory.pdf
16P 2002 NASA Climate Effects of Black Carbon Aerosols in China+India SEPT 22, 2002 Menon_etal_2.pdf
16P 2003 NASA Black Soot+Snow=A Warmer Combination DEC 22, 2003 http___www.giss.nasa.pdf
16P 2003 NASA Finds Soot Has Impact on Global Climate May 13, 2003 http___www.giss.nasa.pdf
16P 2003 NASA Study Soot Hansen_Nazarenko November 4, 2003.pdf
16P 2004 NASA Snow Albedo Table 4 Study http___pubs.giss.nasa.pdf
16P 2005 NASA Distant Origins of Arctic Black Carbon February 25, 2005_Koch_Hansen.pdf
16P 2008 Brown Carbon Climate Impacts August 18, 2008 ENN News.pdf
16P 2008 Carbon + Carbon Black Lenntech Periodic Table Health Effects 2008.pdf
16P 2008 Carbon Black Pollution Major Global Warming Player March 24, 2008 ENN News.pdf
16P 2008 ENN News Black Carbon Pollution Major Global Warming Player March 24, 2008.pdf
16P 2008 ENN News Brown Carbon Climate Impacts August 18, 2008.pdf
16P 2008 Sea Salt Worsens Coastal Air Pollution SDNews April 14, 2008.pdf
16P 2008 Toxicity of Atmospheric Aerosols on Marine Phytoplankton NOV 13, 2008 Abstract Paytan.pdf
16P 2009 Nature Reports June 25, 2009 Reappraising Aerosols-Carbon Black-Soot.pdf
16P 2011 How Black Carbon Affects Arctic Areas May 6, 2011 MCT McClatchy News Graphic.pdf
16P 2011 Ozone Depletion Reduces Ocean Carbon Uptake SD News AUG 9, 2009.pdf
NASA & NOAA Studies
16Q 2005 NASA NEWSLETTER POSTER-ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF CONTRAILS Page 8.pdf
16Q 2006 NASA Studies January 17, 2006 Increasing Aerosol Concentrations-Produce Fog-Like Haze.pdf
16Q 2007 NASA JPL Capabilities for Understanding Planet Earth SEPT 6, 2007 Wolfenbarger.pdf
16Q 2008 NASA Explosions of Magnetic Energy Power Substorms - Aurora Borealis July 24, 2008.pdf
16Q 2008 NASA Ionesphere Moved Lower December 16, 2008.pdf
16Q 2008 NASA Satellite Picture Aircraft Contrails Warm Climate.pdf
16Q 2008 NASA Solar Wind Loses Power September 23, 2008.pdf
16Q 2009 NASA Conducts Airborne Science Aboard Zeppelin Airship in San Francisco October 7, 2009.pdf
16QN 2003 NOAA Aluminum Oxide+Alumina-Silicate+Iron Oxide March 2003 Cirrus Cloud Study.pdf
16QZ 2008 NASA Technical Reports History Search Barium Experiments NASA History July 2, 2008.pdf
16QZ 2011 No Comment on Information Presented NOAA January 16, 2011.pdf
16R 1970 U.S. Navy Project SESAMISEED Artificial Cesium Plasma Clouds May 21, 1970 Abstract.pdf
16R 1975 HAARP U.S. Naval Research Lab Abstract 1975 Ionosphere Symposium.pdf
NASA - U.S. Navy - U.S. Air Force Geoengineering Experiments
16R 1995 HAARP U.S. Naval Research Abstract 1995 Particle Beams + Abstract.pdf
16R 2003 NASA Night Clouds - TMA June 30, 2003 U.S. Air Force-Trimethylaluminum.pdf
16R 2009 HAARP Artificial Ionosphere Created Nature Magazine October 2, 2009 Questions.pdf
16R 2010 NASA Chemcial Releases in the Upper Atmosphsere Project Firefly Summary Report.pdf
16RZ 2009 NASA Search Google September 18, 2009 CARE Project Search.pdf
16RZ 2010 NASA Barium Experiment Search February 25, 2010 Atmospheric Experiments.pdf
Solar Power
16S 2002 WHO Global Solar UV Index Guide.pdf
16S 2008 Scientists Using Lasers to Create Artificial Photosynthesis May 1, 2008.pdf
Trees
16T 2007 GeoengineeredTrees Threaten Forest Ecosystems August 2, 2007.pdf
16T 2008 ENN News July 23, 2008 Improved Forest Practices Cut Carbon Emissions.pdf
16T 2008 Wildfires ENN July 24, 2008 Northern Wildfires Cast Shadow on Arctic Warming.pdf
16T 2009 Geoengineering Fixes Artificial Trees October 8, 2009 by David Biello Big Price Tag.pdf
16T 2009 NASA Tree Deaths Have Doubles Across Western United States January 22, 2009.pdf
16TZ 2008 Managing Trees for Climate Change Mitigation June 13, 2008 Abstract AAAS.pdf
Atmospheric Testing
If you would like more information about atmospheric and upper atmospheric testing experiment please visit this section of the ADC website:
16U 1961 Aurora Nature Magazine October 28, 1961 Photometric Observations of Emission.pdf
16U 1972 Experiment High Altitude Barium Vapor Clouds Abstract January 1972 Space Data Corp.pdf
16U 1993 Finite Element Simulation FES Technique Studies Chemical Modification Ionosphere 1993.pdf
16U 1994 Ionosphere U.S. Experiments 1994 Abstract Barium Charges.pdf
16U 1995 CRRES Chemical Low Altitude Releases Abstract August 1, 1995.pdf
16U 2003 NASA News Night Clouds Trimethylaluminum Released July 1, 2003.pdf
16U 2003 NASA NIGHT CLOUDS 2003 Rockets-Cannisters Trymethylaluminum MSDS DEC 2, 2005.pdf
16U 2003 NASA Night Clouds 2003 Trimethylaluminum Feature Story.pdf
16UZ 1980 Upper Atmosphere Chemical Releases 1980s Book.pdf
16UZ 2010 NASA Barium Experiment Search February 25, 2010 Atmospheric Experiments Search.pdf
Dispersion Methods
16V 1979 Carbon Black Dispersion Abstract Jet Fuel JP-10 Abstract November 1979.pdf
16V 2000 Atmospheric Dispersion Presentations June 6, 2000 Requirements for Dispersion Modeling.pdf
16V 2000 U.S. Air Force Research-Dispersion June 6, 2000 Atmospheric Chemistry Program.pdf
16V 2004 Pentagon Atmospheric Dispersion April 19, 2004 Experiment Sulfur Hexafluoride SF6.pdf
16V 2010 NASA Search Cloud Dispersal March 1, 2010 Page 1.pdf
16V 2010 NASA Search Cloud Dispersal March 1, 2010 Page 2.pdf
Volcanoes
16VV 2010 Iceland Volcano Views of Volcanic Ash Plume Over Europe NYTimes April 15, 2010 Video.pdf
16VV2010 Volcano Eruption in Iceland Will Change Climate+Pollute the Air NYTimes April 15, 2010.pdf
16VZ 2000 Atmospheric Dispersion Within Federal Community Workshop-Weather June 6-8, 2000.pdf
Worldwide Weather Modification Programs & Experiments + United States Experiments
16W 1993 Weather Modification Cold Fogbusters Arcata California Tests American Heritage Miller.pdf
16W 2002 NASA NIAC JAN 7, 2002 Controlling the Gobal Weather+Hurricanes Hoffman.pdf
16W 2002 Weather Hoffman February 2002 Can We Control the Weather-Jets.pdf
16W 2004 NASA NIAC Controlling Global Weather Final Report March 31, 2004 Hoffman.pdf
16W 2006 Hurricanes Dust May Dampen Hurricane Fury October 11, 2006 Science Daily.pdf
16W 2007 Geoengineering Hurricanes Telegraph.co.uk October 24, 2007.pdf
16W 2007 Scientists A Step Closer to Steering Hurricanes Telepgraph UK October 21, 2007.pdf
16W 2008 Hurricanes to be Tamed by U.S. Homeland Security February 8, 2008 Telegraph.co.uk.pdf
16W 2008 NWV What Your Meteorologist & Media Are Not Telling You September 6, 2008 by Peterson.pdf
16W 2010 Geoengineering-Weather Modification European Union Times January 3, 2010.pdf
Weather Modification United States Issues + Listing of Programs in the United States.
16WA 2008 NOAA Final Listing of Weather Modification Programs Spreadsheet 08WXMOD5.pdf
16WA 2009 NOAA Final Listing of Weather Modification Programs Spreadsheet 09WXMOD5.pdf
16WA 2009 United States Weather Modification Map 2009 based on NOAA Public Data.pdf
16WA 2010 NCAR-UCAR News+Maps Worldwide Weather Modification Programs March 2, 2010.pdf
16WA 2010 NOAA Final Listing of Weather Modification Programs Spreadsheet 10WXMOD5.pdf
Popular Science Information on Private Weather Modification Schemes
16WD 2005 Popular Science Magazine Jet Plume December 2005.pdf
16WD 2005 Popular Science December 2005 Crop Dusting Cyclones.pdf
16WD 2006 Hurricanes June 25, 2006 Dyn-O-Mat Chicago Tribune News.pdf
Weather Events & Geoengineering
16WZ 2009 Hurricane Bill August 19, 2009 AOL News - Atlantic Ocean.pdf
U.S. Government Information
16X 2004 Geoengineering Options Summary Gaskill June 29, 2004 DOE.pdf
16X 2008 Climate Principles Letter Speaker Pelosi & U.S. Senate April 22, 2008.pdf
16X 2008 Money+Lobbyists Hurt European Efforts to Curb Pollution Times December 11, 2008.pdf
16X 2009 U.S. Department of Energy ASP Atmospheric Science Program March 2009 http___www.asp.bnl.pdf
16X 2010 Geoengineering When the Day After Tomorrow Has Come June 28, 2010 NYTimes by Dean.pdf
16XZ 2010 Geoengineering + Other Subjects AAAS Symposium February 18-22, 2010 Annual Meeting.pdf
16XZ 2010 Geoengineering Save us From Global Warming AAAS Annual Meeting February 18-22-2010.pdf
16XZ 2010 Geoengineerng Human Dimensions AAAS Annual Meeting San Diego February 18-22, 2010.pdf
16XZ 2011 AAAR American Association for Aerosol Research Meetings Website March 2, 2011.pdf
16XZ 2011 AAAR American Association for Aerosol Research Related Links March 2, 2011 Website.pdf
16XZ 2011 AAAR American Association for Aerosol Research Website March 3, 2011 http___www.aaar.pdf
16XZ 2011 AAAR Particulars in 2010+Briefing Website March 2, 2011 http___archive.constantcontact.pdf
16 1 Hobbyist Stunned by His Earth Photos March 27, 2010 MSNBC http_www.msnbc.msn.pdf The public now has the ability to watch these geoengineering experiments up close and at a price most can afford.
16 1 B U.S. + UK House of Commons Joint Statement on Geoengineering 2010.pdf
16Z 2010 AAAS Meeting February 26, 2010 Geoengineering Ken Caldiera BBC Radio Broadcast+Cheetahs+Elephants (BBC Radio show)
Geoengineering: Destroying The Atmosphere with Rosalind Peterson - Uploaded by TheAlexJonesChannel on Feb 25, 2012 - Global Geoengineering Governance: Currently the U.S. Government, our military, NASA (other U.S. agencies), any city, county, state, private individuals, corporations, foreign governments, and foreign corporations, can initiate any type of geoengineering or weather modification experiments without public knowledge, consent, government restrictions or public debate. (Water Vapor produced by Aviation is contributing to warming of area like Alaska & the Arctic according to recent university studies. NASA notes that jet contrails turning into man-made clouds exacerbates global warming since water vapor is a greenhouse gas.)
http://www.agriculturedefensecoalition.org/content/geoengineering-curren...
http://www.agriculturedefensecoalition.org/content/alaska-arctic-issues
http://www.agriculturedefensecoalition.org/?q=geoengineering
FYI from the GAO . . .
In it's February 2000 report 'Aviation and the Environment', the US Government Accountability Office states:
"Aviation emissions are a potentially significant and growing percentage of greenhouse gases and other emissions that are thought to contribute to global warming. Aircraft emissions are potentially significant for several reasons. First, jet aircraft are the main source of human emissions deposited directly into the upper atmosphere, where they may have a greater warming effect than if they were released at the earth's surface. 'According to data from a 1999 report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, global aviation contributed about 145 million metric tons of carbon in 1996, or about 2.4 percent of all human-generated carbon emissions – an amount roughly equivalent to the total carbon emissions of Canada'." Summary (HTML) - Full Report (PDF) | Abstract IPPC 1999 Report (HTML)
May 12, 2011
BBC News Report-Video
"...US embassy cables released show nations are racing to "carve up" Arctic resources - oil, gas and
even rubies - as the ice retreats. They suggest that Arctic states, including the US and Russia, are all pushing to stake a claim. The opportunity to exploit resources has come because of a dramatic fall in the amount of ice in the Arctic. The US Geological Survey estimates oil reserves off Greenland are as big as those in the North Sea.
The cables were released by the Wikileaks whistleblower website as foreign ministers from the eight Arctic Council member states - Russia, the United States, Canada, Denmark, Norway, Finland, Sweden and Iceland - met in Nuuk, Greenland, on Thursday to sign a treaty on international search and rescue in the Arctic and discuss the region's future challenges. The cables claim the Danish Foreign Minister Per Stig Moeller joked with the Americans saying "if you stay out, then the rest of us will have more to carve up in the Arctic"..."
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/newsnight/9483790.stm
Developing an International Framework for Geoengineering (Video)
Council on Foreign Relations Website: March 10, 2010 General Meeting:
Developing an International Framework for Geoengineering
http://www.cfr.org/climate-change/developing-international-framework-geoengineering-video/p21636
Speakers: M. Granger Morgan, Head, Department of Engineering & Public Policy, Carnegie Mellon University
John D. Steinbruner, Director, Center for International & Security Studies, University of Maryland
Presider: Ruth Greenspan Beill, Acting U.S. Climate Policy Director, World Resources Institute
November 15, 2007
Environmental scientist David Keith proposes a cheap, effective, shocking means to address climate change: What if we injected a huge cloud of ash into the atmosphere to deflect sunlight and heat.
__________________________________________________________________________________
Video About Energy from Salt Water
16 Experiments Using Salt Water for Energy - March 2010 MSNBC SaltWater.wmv (6.7MB)
CLIMOS-OCEAN IRON FERTILIZATION COMPANY
Documents coming soon.
PLANKTOS-OCEAN IRON FERTILIZATION COMPANY
Documents coming soon.
Click on the image to see it full size.
X 1 Photograph Calpella CA Mendocino County, CA 2005 by Rosalind Peterson "X" Marks the Spot.
Persistent Jet Contrails that turn into man-made clouds, according to NASA studies, exacerbate global warming, change our climate, and negatively impact natural resources. The jets that leave these persistent contrails are engaged in a type of atmospheric geoengineering which may have other negative consequences.
Persistant jet contrails also produce white haze and cirrus clouds which may have reduced the amount of direct sunlight reaching the earth, disrupted plant and tree health due to lack of photosynthesis, and lowered crop production at various times in the past twenty years due to the extreme amount of man-made cloud cover in Northern California.
This type of persistent jet contrail first appeared in Mendocino County in the late 1980s when the configuration of military jet fuel changed from JP-4 to JP-8 with additives. Mendocino and the adjoining Lake County (in Northern Califonria), also became Military Operations Areas (Listed as MOA 1, 2 & 3 on NOAA Flight Maps), without the consent or knowledge of most of the residents in these counties.
Massive fireball reported across Midwestern sky - CNN.com Wednesday, April 14, 2010 (video)
16 Iceland Volcano Photograph April 2010 Unknown Photographer.pdf
Agenda Steve Paikin — March 18, 2010 — Is geoengineering the answer to the world's climate change woes?
Guests:
John Stone is adjunct research professor at Carleton University.
Alan Robock is distinguished professor of Climatology, director of the Meteorology Undergraduate Program, and associate director of the Center for Environmental Prediction Department of Environmental Sciences at Rutgers University.
David Keith is director of ISEEE Energy and Environmental Systems Group, the Canada research chair in Energy and the Environment at the University of Calgary.
San Francisco Commonwealth Club Video:
Geoengineering Global Salvation or Ruin?
February 23, 2010
Uploaded by StanfordUniversity on Mar 22, 2011
January 31, 2011
David Keith, Professor of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering at the University of Calgary, explores possibilities for the intentional alteration of Earth's radiation budget as a means to mitigate risks to Earth's climate and human society in the face of insufficient or ineffective emissions reduction efforts.
Stanford University
http://www.stanford.edu
Univ. of Calgary Dept. of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering
http://schulich.ucalgary.ca/chemical
A Small Group of Individuals, Professors, Climate Scientists, and others have been promoting Geoengineering programs and experiments for the past ten years. There are a very few who have raised serious questions about these experiments. You will find below names that have been engaged in the last few years speaking about Geoengineering Schemes. A few note potential consequences from these experiments, like air and water pollution or acid rains. The majority of promoters want to experiment no matter what the consequences advising the public that we should be the guinea pigs living inside their experiments. A few have even stated that if people are harmed it doesn't matter...that they feel that this is a price we should all pay so that they can conduct their experiments.
16YA 2010 Allenby Geoengineerng February 25, 2010 Science Daily News.pdf
16YA 2010 Allenby March 24, 2010 Arizona State University - Geoengineering Braden Allenby.pdf
16YB 2010 Bunzl Profile-Rutgers-New Jersey March 24, 2010 Martin Bunzl.pdf
16YC 2000 Caldiera Geoegineering Earth Caldeira July 2000 Abstract.pdf
16YC 2007 Caldiera Climate Geoengineering July 25, 2007 Caldiera Wired Science Article.pdf
16YC 2007 Caldiera Geoengineering NY Times October 24, 2007 Caldiera.pdf
16YC 2009 Caldiera Geoengineering October 21, 2009 Yale Environment 360 Ken Caldeira Interview.pdf
16YF 2006 Fleming Climate Engineers The Wilson Quarterly 2006.pdf
16YF 2007 Fleming Geoengineering 2007 Wilson Quarterly The Climate Engineers Jame R. Fleming.pdf
16YK 1992 Keith Geoengineering David Keith A Serious Look At Geoengineering 1992.pdf
16YK 2001 Keith Geoengineering David W. Keith January 18, 2001.pdf
16YK 2003 Keith Geoegineering David Keith Carnegie Mellon University 2003 Home Page.pdf
16YK 2009 Keith Time Magazine September 22, 2009 Article on David Keith Climate Geoengineer.pdf
16YK 2010 David Keith Homepage August 31, 2010 Director ISEEE Energy+Environmental Systems Group.pdf
16YK 2011 Keith Solar Geoengineering as a Tool to Manage Climate Risks JAN 31, 2011 Presentation.pdf
16YKZ 2009 Keith Time Magazine September 22, 2009 Climate Change Research.pdf
16YL 2006 Lawrence Geoengineering To Speak or Not to Speak - Essay 2006 Mark G. Lawrence.pdf
16YL 2007 Lovelock Geoengineering Oceans Lovelock 2007 Guardian UK.pdf
16YM 1996 Matthews Climate Engineering 1996 Ben Matthews.pdf
16YM 2003 Michaelson A Climate Change Manhatten Project by Jay Michaelson 2003.pdf
16YM 2006 MacCracken Geoengineering Worthy of Cautions Evaluation 2006.pdf
16YM 2007 MacCracken Geoengineering News and Nature May 9, 2007 MacCracken.pdf
16YM 2010 MacCracken February 6, 2010 Climate Intervention Discussion.pdf
16YM 2010 MacCracken Geoengineering February 27, 2010 Search Google-Items of Interest MacCracken.pdf
16YP 2005 Popp NOV 2005 Geoengineering R+D Subsidies+Policies - Is There a Free Lunch David Popp.pdf
16YR 2010 Rogers February 4, 2010 Climate Intervention A Geochemcial Approach.pdf
16YS 2010 Shepherd-Professor John Shepherd Publications Climate Change Model 3.1 Rad-Conv%20Text.pdf
16YSZ 2009 Shepherd Professor John Shepherd Publications in 2009 Note Geoengineering.pdf
16YW 2006 Wigley UCAR Geoengineering Atmospheric Injections Particles+Chemicals Tom Wigley 2006.pdf
No Comment
16Z 2003 Geoengineering No Comment Public Debate Needed 2003.pdf
16Z 2003 Guardian Unlimited Search 2002-2003 Climate - Drumbeat Driving Cap+Trade Ponzi Schemes in Climate Bill.pdf
16Z 2008 No Comment Global Warming Dissent December 23, 2008 WNDNews Needs Investigation.pdf
16Z 2010 Climate Instititue Strategic Plan 2008-2013.pdf
16Z 2010 Climate Institute About Us Website March 24, 2010.pdf
16Z 2010 Climate Institute Board of Advisors Website March 24, 2010.pdf
16Z 2010 Climate Institute History March 24, 2010 Website.pdf
16Z 2010 Climate Institute Management Website March 24, 2010 - Geoengineering Issues.pdf
16Z 2010 Climate Institute Michael MacCracken PH.D Biography March 24, 2010.pdf
16Z 2010 Climate Institute Website Board of Directors March 24, 2019.pdf
16Z 2010 Climate Progress September 5, 2009 Note Caldiera Quotes on Geoengineering.pdf
16Z 2010 Corporate Watch on Geoengineering Technofixes Website July 2, 2010.pdf
16Z 2010 Geoengineering Article by Science Now Issue Links - February 20, 2010.pdf
16Z 2010 Geoengineering February 20, 2010 AAAS Meeting-The Latest on Hacking the Planet.pdf
16Z 2010 Geoengineering Meeting - San Diego - February 18-22, 2010 AAAS Scientists-Many Topics.pdf
16Z 2010 Geoengineering Search S.F. Examiner Newspaper February 11, 2010 Page 1.pdf
16Z 2010 Geoengineering Search S.F. Examiner Newspaper February 11, 2010 Page 2.pdf
16Z 2010 Geoengineering Search S.F. Examiner Newspaper February 11, 2010 Page 3.pdf
16Z 2010 Geoengineering Search S.F. Examiner Newspaper February 11, 2010 Page 4.pdf
16Z 2010 Geoengineering Search S.F. Examiner Newspaper February 11, 2010 Page 5.pdf
16Z 2010 Geoengineering Search S.F. Examiner Newspaper February 11, 2010 Page 6.pdf
16Z 2010 The Climate Response Fund Climate Intervention News March 24, 2010 Website.pdf
16Z 2010 The Climate Response Fund Founder+CEO Dr. Margaret Leinen March 24, 2010 Website.pdf
16Z 2010 The Climate Response Fund March 24, 2010 Website Recent Press.pdf
16Z 2010 The Climate Response Fund Policy Statement March 24, 2010 Website.pdf
16Z 2010 The Climate Response Fund Science Advisors March 24, 2010.pdf
16Z 2010 The Climate Response Fund Strategic Advisors March 24, 2010.pdf
16Z 2010 The Climate Response Fund Website March 24, 2010 Board of Directors.pdf
16Z 2010 U.S. House Legislation H.R. 1905 Coastal State Climate Change Planning Act 2010.pdf
16Z 2011 Geoengineering by Ananda Global Research July 30, 2010.pdf
16Z 2011 Geoengineering Wikipedia Website July 22, 2011 General Information+Links.pdf
NASA JPL Presentation on Geoengineering & Climate Change February 14, 2013
Video Lecture Series California Institute of Technology - What type of thinking is going on now with regard to Geoengineering?
Many Questions - Water Vapor (a potent greenhouse gas), and aviation questions are not raised in this presentation...Why?
http://www.ustream.tv/recorded/29293171#/recorded/29293171/highlight/326770
China - Gates Foundation - New NSF Funded Group Penn State - Governance Questions - Methods & Problems with Geoengineering
NASA Space Weather August 9, 2011
MAJOR SOLAR FLARE: This morning at 0805 UT, sunspot 1263 produced a powerful X7-class solar flare. NASA's Solar Dynamics Observatory captured the explosion's extreme ultraviolet flash-See Video. The brunt of the explosion was not Earth directed. Nevertheless, a minor proton storm is in progress around our planet, which could affect satellites in high-altitude orbits. Also, radiation from flare created waves of ionization in Earth's upper atmosphere, briefly disrupting communications at some VLF and HF radio frequencies.SOHO coronagraphs show a CME emerging from the blast site. The cloud will probably miss Earth. At this time, however, we cannot rule out a glancing blow from the flank of the CME on or about August 11th, 2011.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vzMVfJKJK_c
"Geoengineering Earth's Climate" by Ken Caldeira January 7, 2008
Presentation on Video This talk will present much of what is known about such geoengineering
approaches, and raise a range of issues likely to stimulate lively discussion. Speaker: Ken Caldeira
Ken Caldeira is a scientist at the Carnegie Institution Department of Global Ecology and a Professor
(by courtesy) at the Stanford University Department of Environmental and Earth System Sciences.
Previously, he worked for 12 years in the Energy and Environment Directorate at the Lawrence
Livermore National Laboratory (Department of Energy). His research interests include the numerical
simulation of Earth's climate, carbon, and biogeochemistry; ocean acidification; climate emergency
response systems; evaluating approaches to supplying environmentally-friendly energy services; ocean
carbon sequestration; long-term evolution of climate and geochemical cycles; and marine biogeochemical
cycles. Caldeira has a B.A. in Philosophy from Rutgers College and an M.S. and Ph.D. in Atmospheric
Sciences from New York University.
"...Caldeira: I used to work at Lawrence Livermore Lab where we all participated in a meeting. Where we sat around the room thinking of ways to manipulate geophysical systems to use it as a weapon. That means could you somehow interfere with the Earth’s functioning in a way that you could use it as a military weapon. Could you change climate, what could you do to manipulate the Earth’s physical system. Some of the ideas were, could we blow up hydrogen bombs underwater or offshore to make a tidal wave that would go over a city. The result was isn't it easier to drop the hydrogen bomb on the city. Now, you could imagine putting pathogens in a cloud. Let the cloud go over somewhere and rain down on your enemy, do chemical or germ warfare. That may work on something as big as the former Soviet Union, where you could be pretty sure that in a few days that cloud would rain out..."
16Z 2009 Climate Gate "Key Players" Video - No Comment
16Z 2009 Climate Gate "Key Players" Video - No Comment
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b01771jt
Few branches of science divide opinion as sharply as that championed by Professor David Keith. He's one of the pre-eminent geo-engineers striving to find new ways to combat global warming, by altering the way the sea, the clouds and the atmosphere work. This isn't a replacement, he says, for the political drive to reduce emissions. But is geo-engineering a cost-effective, emergency stop-gap, before the effects of climate change become irreversible, or a dangerous leap into the unknown?
Space Chronicles
http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/305092-1
Neil deGrasse Tyson talks about the history and future of NASA and the US space program. He argues that the exploration of space benefits Americans more than they may think. Hosted by theAmerican Museum of Natural Historyin New York City.
Using Aerosol Injections for Geoengineering - Joyce Penner, University of Michigan - Video
http://video.mit.edu/watch/using-aerosol-injections-for-geoengineering-4828/